![]() Learn more Is Scrivener the Best Writing Software? We might earn a small commission if you purchase something through our site. ProWritingAid: Best Style & Grammar Editor So here’s how the competition stacks up… 1. ProWritingAid is mostly known as a grammar editor for your word processor. But it’s actually got a lot more than that under the hood. You can pull up the web version and start writing ASAP. They have standard desktop apps if you can’t live without them. And it even integrates with Open Office, Google Docs, and yes… Scrivener. You can pick up the Premium license and use it on unlimited devices. Plus, there are no word count restrictions or any other limitations - so it’s ‘all-in’ pricing. Yes, ProWritingAid has made its name as a grammar checker for your word processor. However, there’s actually a lot more to their editor. ![]() The reporting is also excellent, giving you a detailed breakdown of bad habits for Microsoft Word:Īnd even different readability levels: ProWritingAid Cons It’s like having a built-in writing coach that gives you feedback on everything from the overall structure and readability, to stylistic issues - even overused words and phrases. ProWritingAid’s editor is great for simple, one-off pieces in Microsoft Word. Unfortunately, they lack advanced features like distraction-free writing. And it’s also limited for organizing large projects like books or scripts. ProtWritingAid currently only works with U.S., U.K., Canadian, and Australian English writing. ProWritingAid Costs, Plans, & Payment Options No other foreign languages are supported. ProWritingAid’s annual pricing starts at $50, with a lifetime option at $175. ![]() That’s what I paid: Do I Recommend ProWritingAid? The good news is that you can also pick up a coupon to bring the cost down to $36 for the year. Yes - if you work on simple, straightforward writing projects and don’t need built-in organizations for chapters. Write! App: Best Distraction-Free Desktop App with Cloud Sync It’s easy to use, compatible with basically everything, and adds the bonus of built-in grammar reporting for your writing. Choose between two different distraction-free writing options Write! App is super intuitive, offers two distraction-free writing environments, and is priced really well. They offer two different writing options to block distractions and zero-in on the words you’re typing. You can also change the background and text colors, too. The ‘Focus Mode’ will block all notifications, pop-ups, and apps on your site to make sure nothing gets in the way of putting words down on the page (err, screen). Write! App is technically a desktop writing app. But it’s cloud-sync feature means that whatever you’re working on is automatically backed up to the cloud so that you never lose a single document. You can ‘publish’ Write! App documents to quickly get a shareable link that you can send over to friends or colleagues so they can access your text editor and writing online. Write! App also supports 35 different languages, and it will even perform basic writing spell checks during your writing process. Write! App works well across Windows, Mac, or Linux devices. Write! App doesn’t offer the same level of exports that Scrivener does, only providing PDF, Plain Text, or Markdown files for book writing. The good thing for book writing is that Write! App will help sync your documents automatically to the cloud. ![]() For casual, unsophisticated applications by someone who grew up with green screen character based computers, it's probably OK.However, the bummer is that they don’t really allow you to flip between older revisions of the same document. For this reason, I would not recommend Emacs to anyone who is under 50 year old, or who needs power user capabilities. The things I just mentioned, are all present in some limited and inept form, but falls far short of current standard of good user interface design. To this day, it lacks or struggles with very basic things, like interactive dialogs, toolbars, tabbed interface, file system navigation, etc., etc. So Emacs does 5% or what an editor should do quite will, and is surprisingly under-powered and old fashioned at the other 95%. Unfortunately, it didn't keep up with the times and fails to take advantage of the entire world of GUI design that's revolutionized computer science since then. In fairness to Emacs, its original design was conceived in that context and is rather good at some things, like flexible ability to bind commands to keyboard shortcuts. User interface is terrible I was using Emacs in the early 1980's, before there were GUIs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |